App options + different bridges

[Vidar_Hageman]

Two questions. First will there be a web or desktop version of incognito in the near future, or that some point? The feds could come after sidechains and privacy mechanisms/coins in an attempt to control this market. If incognito ever got taken off the App Store I would be screwed. Can there at least be a paper wallet option? Also matic (polygon) has been upgraded for months at this point with it’s own network. I should have the option to transact on the polygon network and not be stuck with an 100 dollar ethereum fee. Is there anything being done to rectify this?

[Jared]

@Vidar_Hageman

First will there be a web or desktop version of incognito in the near future, or that some point?

Yes there will eventually be another wallet other than just via the app. Development into other wallets has been postponed to focus on pDEX v3 which should be released before the end of October.

@Vidar_Hageman

with an 100 dollar ethereum fee.

Yes, fees are high right now. Follow this discussion:

Cheapest way to send coins elsewhere

Hey i’ve been trying to send my coin outside of the incognito app and into my coinbase account and the fees are astronomically high is there anyway i can bypass this fee

@Vidar_Hageman

If incognito ever got taken off the App Store I would be screwed.

If you have an Android phone the apk file is available here:

Release PRV Pegging · incognitochain/incognito-wallet

[Vidar_Hageman]

So I’ll ask again. Is there an attempt to follow other projects as they optimize? I don’t care about ethereum fees as much as I care about the fact I don’t have the option to transact on the polygon network without leaving incognito. They have 100 million users on their network and I cannot access it from this app. This app is going to be obsolete if it cannot properly accompany the use of Layer 2 solutions

[abduraman]

If your “only” concern is about fees, you may use one of Polygon-BSC bridges. So you can access Polygon network indirectly using BSC - Incognito bridge.

[Vidar_Hageman]

How do I use that?

[Vidar_Hageman]

Looking on MetaMask and the smart chain when I search up incognito nothing comes up. I could be retarded?

[abduraman]

Metamask is only required for decentralized shielding&unshielding. You may use address generation option. If you insists on using Metamask, you may follow these:

[Staging app] ETH/ERC20 tokens decentralized shielding

We’re changing the way of releasing products to letting users experience new features sooner so that the core team can receive feedback and bug reports prior to rolling an official version out. In the new process, users can give new features a try beforehand it is published in the production environment. The first feature that is piloted with this release process is ETH/ERC20 decentralized shielding. As mentioned in the topic, a user will be able to shield ETH/ERC20 tokens right from his person…

[App v4.3.11] ETH/ERC20 tokens decentralized shielding

Hey Incognito users, We’re excited to introduce a new feature that allows you to shield ETH/ERC20 tokens into Incognito right from your personal crypto wallet. This works best on Metamask and Trust Wallet, the two best ones among wallets supporting the WalletConnect protocol. In case you don’t know yet, WalletConnect is an open protocol for connecting wallets (e.g. Metamask, Trust Wallet, etc) to dApps (e.g. Incognito app). You can also find the exhausted list here. The following is a demonstr…

They are for ETH but BSC is also very similar. You should change RPC endpoints of Metamask for BSC.

[Vidar_Hageman]

Bruh I said nothing about insisting to use MetaMask. The process for ETH and BSC are not the same. So there is a bridge for bsc and incognito and specific directions on how to use it? Tried clicking on the video it doesn’t work. This is an absolute joke.